Thessaloniki · 12 Leontos Sofou St.
Defence Lawyer Against Cepal Auctions and Enforcement in Thessaloniki and Throughout Greece
Objection · Suspension · Debt Settlement
Documents from Cepal do not simply ask for money. They set in motion a procedure with specific stages, strict deadlines and real consequences for the debtor's property. A formal notice terminating the contract, a payment order, an enforcement order, a seizure and a foreclosure are not addressed by waiting. They are addressed with review, strategy and immediate legal response. Our office systematically handles cases against banks, funds, claim acquisition companies and claim management companies, with particular experience in objections, suspensions, foreclosures and settlement negotiations. Ioannis Papaioannou, legal counsel to the Borrowers' & Consumer Protection Association of Northern Greece, has defended borrowers against banks and loan servicers for over 25 years. We know Cepal's pattern, we know where it pushes and, above all, we know which points of the case must be checked before the debtor concludes there is no other option.
What Is Cepal and What Does It Mean for Your Loan?
Cepal Hellas Financial Services is not a bank and is not the holder of the claim. It is a claim management company that acts on behalf of the entity presented as the holder of the claim — namely a special purpose vehicle that acquired loan claims from banks. This means that in every case it must be examined who the actual holder of the claim is, when and how the loan was transferred, with what documents the transfer is proven, whether Cepal has standing to act in the specific procedure and whether the amount claimed is established in a lawful, clear and verifiable manner. The existence of a document from Cepal does not mean everything is settled. It means the case must be reviewed immediately. Before any settlement is made, we must know what is being claimed, by whom, on what basis of standing and with what calculation.
Protecting Your Home from a Foreclosure Initiated by Cepal
Cepal is one of the claim management companies most frequently seen in enforcement and foreclosure proceedings. In a number of cases its stance appears particularly strict and inflexible, especially when settlement proposals are rejected without a real assessment of the debtor's actual financial circumstances. But that can also be the weak point of the case. An uncompromising stance, when combined with prolonged inaction, refusal of a sustainable settlement, excessive inflation of the debt, incomplete information or enforcement pursued without real weighing of the circumstances, may under certain conditions be used legally — particularly in the context of arguments of abuse of right. In every case we review from the start Cepal's standing, the assignment of the claim, the amount of the debt, the interest, the charges, the abusive terms, the services of process and every act of enforcement. The high volume of cases handled by management companies often leads to standardised moves. It is there, in the details that must not be left unchecked, that real defence can be found. We treat no foreclosure as final. We examine whether there is room for an objection, a suspension application, entry into the out-of-court workout, direct negotiation or another targeted action. The goal is not merely to gain time. The goal is to shift the balance, before enforcement appears as the only road.
Businesses and Self-Employed Professionals
Enforcement does not concern home loans only. Professional and corporate loans, working capital, current accounts, bond loans and personal guarantees of managers and partners equally lead to payment orders, seizures and auctions, often with larger amounts and more complex files. The logic of the defence stays the same, but the points to check are more.
- Professional and corporate loans: review of the contract, the securities, the balance and the legal standing of the party pursuing.
- Personal guarantees: when the entrepreneur, manager or partner has guaranteed, the extent and limits of liability are checked separately. A guarantee is not always unlimited or valid.
- Business property and equipment: seizure of business premises, machinery or goods is met with an objection and an application for suspension, just like a home.
- Out-of-court mechanism for businesses: settlement of debts to banks, funds, social security (EFKA) and the tax office in a single framework, where the conditions are met.
For businesses and professionals, time and the proper organisation of the file count double, because the amounts are larger and the consequences for viability immediate.
Received a Notice, Payment Order or Seizure from Cepal — The Deadlines That Must Not Be Missed
Not all documents from Cepal carry the same legal weight. A formal notice terminating the contract is the first serious warning step. A payment order turns the claim into a judicial title. A seizure means enforcement has already begun and, when it concerns real property, an auction is set along with it.
Formal notice terminating the contract
With a formal notice terminating the contract, we do not stay idle. The debt is now presented as overdue and due, and the way to the next move is open. At this stage there may not yet be an objection deadline, but there is time to review the case, to respond formally, to negotiate and to prepare a defence before the claim takes a judicial form.
Payment order
With a payment order, we act immediately. An objection is filed within fifteen working days of its service, when the debtor's residence or seat is in Greece. If the residence or seat is abroad or unknown, the deadline is thirty working days. If this deadline is missed, the debtor's position is decisively weakened.
Seizure
With a seizure, there is no room for half-measures. An objection against enforcement, on grounds concerning the claim, the writ of execution, the preliminary procedure and the seizure itself, is filed within forty-five days from the date of seizure. If a suspension of the auction must also be sought, that step is examined separately and must be taken at the right time.
Greek law does not wait for the debtor to recover from the shock. Every stage opens a window for action that closes at some point. That is why the case must be reviewed from the start, before enforcement appears as the only road.
Do you have a Cepal document in front of you?
Immediate first review: what was served, which deadline is running, what options you have. Call 2310 545 261 or send the contact form.
Negotiation Strategy with Cepal — Settlement Aimed at Debt Write-Off (Haircut)
You do not approach Cepal to ask for a favour. You approach it to present a position. Whichever side knows the case better holds the negotiating advantage. Our job is to make sure that advantage passes to the debtor. Before any contact we review Cepal's standing, the actual holder of the claim, the assignment, the balance, the interest, the charges and every element that affects the amount. We do not enter a negotiation without knowing exactly what claim we are dealing with. An amount that has not been verified must not become the starting point of a discussion.
- The settlement must be tailored to actual repayment capacity. The goal is not an agreement that looks good on paper and collapses after a few months. The goal is a settlement that holds up over time, with specific numbers, a specific financial basis and a clear strategy.
- On that basis we also build the request for a debt write-off (haircut). Cepal manages claims linked to portfolios acquired at an economic value below the nominal balance.
- We do not treat that as theory. We use it in practice, combined with the value of the security, collectability, the history of the claim and the facts of the case.
- The best negotiation happens when the debtor has already exercised, or is ready to exercise, their rights. A well-founded objection, a suspension application or a serious judicial challenge works as a negotiating lever. The claim manager realises it is not facing a frightened debtor but a legally represented counterparty.
The goal is not the best possible settlement under pressure. It is the settlement that fits the specific case. With specific numbers, specific arguments and a specific strategy. The best terms are not given. They are won through review, preparation and properly built pressure.
Before signing anything with Cepal — speak to us first.
A rushed settlement can be worse than signing nothing. We review first, then decide.
Immediate File ReviewObjection and Suspension of Cepal Auctions in Thessaloniki
Cepal's high case volume makes it particularly exposed to procedural defects. Grounds that typically support objections and suspensions in Cepal cases:
- Weak authority chain: securitisation and management assignment involve multiple transfer steps that must each be properly documented — gaps here are a significant basis for objection.
- Incorrect debt amount: unlawful compound interest, abusive fees, miscalculated default interest.
- Unfair contractual terms: clauses that were not individually negotiated and that undermine the legal foundation of the claim.
- Formal enforcement defects: irregular service of process, incorrect amounts in the seizure report, failure to observe mandatory intervals.
Where the case requires it, an objection is accompanied by an immediate suspension application so that the auction is stayed until a court decision is issued. This combination — legal defence and parallel negotiation — is usually the most effective approach.
Decisions We Have Won
Real cases against debt management companies.
Το Πολυμελές Πρωτοδικείο Αθηνών έκανε δεκτή αγωγή καταναλωτή–δανειολήπτη και ακύρωσε ως καταχρηστικούς βασικούς όρους σύμβασης πίστωσης.
Η κρίση του Δικαστηρίου θεμελιώθηκε στην παραβίαση του άρθρου 2 παρ. 7 του ν. 2251/1994, καθώς και στις γενικές αρχές της καλής πίστης και της συναλλακτικής διαφάνειας. Ακυρώθηκαν ρήτρες που προέβλεπαν: • μονομερή μεταβολή επιτοκίων και λοιπών χρεώσεων χωρίς αντικειμενικά κριτήρια, • επιβολή τόκων υπερημερίας χωρίς ανάλυση επιμέρους κονδυλίων, • και παραπομπή σε δείκτες όπως ο iTraxx, μη προσιτούς και μη κατανοητούς από τον μέσο συναλλασσόμενο. Κατόπιν της ακύρωσης των ανωτέρω όρων, δεν υφίσταται νομικό έρεισμα για τον προσδιορισμό ληξιπρόθεσμης και εκκαθαρισμένης απαίτησης, ικανής να θεμελιώσει έκδοση διαταγής πληρωμής. Στο Δικηγορικό Γραφείο Παπαϊωάννου Ιωάννη και Συνεργατών, προσεγγίζουμε κάθε υπόθεση με θεμελιωμένη νομική στρατηγική, επιμένοντας στη σαφήνεια των συμβατικών σχέσεων και στη δικαστική προστασία του εντολέα με τεκμηριωμένο και ουσιαστικό τρόπο.
Read the decisionΤελεσίδικη κρίση. Ακύρωση διαταγής πληρωμής.
Το Εφετείο έκρινε ότι η επίσπευση ήταν καταχρηστική, χωρίς προηγούμενη ενημέρωση, μετά από χρόνια αδράνειας, με σωρευτικούς τόκους και αιφνιδιασμό.Σε υποθέσεις που κρίνουν το μέλλον της περιουσίας σας, ο πειραματισμός δεν συγχωρείται. Επιλογές χωρίς στρατηγική ή χωρίς γνώση του αντικειμένου μπορεί να οδηγήσουν όχι σε λύση, αλλά σε απώλεια. Στο Δικηγορικό Γραφείο Παπαϊωάννου Ιωάννη και Συνεργατών, το αποτέλεσμα δεν ήταν αποτέλεσμα τύχης. Ήταν ζήτημα μεθόδου, πολυετούς εμπειρίας και στοχευμένου χειρισμού. Το Δικηγορικό Γραφείο Παπαϊωάννου Ιωάννη και Συνεργατών εξυπηρετεί εντολείς σε όλη την Ελλάδα.
Read the decisionΤελεσίδικη ακύρωση διαταγής πληρωμής – Εφετείο
Τελεσίδικη ακύρωση διαταγής πληρωμής – Το Εφετείο έκρινε ότι η απαίτηση δεν είχε νομικό θεμέλιο. Η ενοχή δεν τεκμηριώθηκε, η εκτέλεση σταμάτησε. Το Εφετείο ακύρωσε τελεσίδικα διαταγή πληρωμής, διαπιστώνοντας ότι η απαίτηση δεν τεκμηριώθηκε ούτε ως προς το ύψος, ούτε ως προς τη νομική της βάση. Η κρίση στηρίχθηκε στο άρθρο 174 ΑΚ, αφού δεν υπήρχε σαφής δήλωση βούλησης για τη δημιουργία ενοχής. Η νομιμοποίηση του servicer δεν αρκούσε – το Δικαστήριο ζήτησε ουσία και δεν τη βρήκε. Η εκτέλεση σταμάτησε οριστικά και η περιουσία του εντολέα μας προστατεύθηκε πλήρως. Στο Δικηγορικό Γραφείο Παπαϊωάννου Ιωάννη και Συνεργατών, αξιοποιούμε κάθε νομική ατέλεια. Και όταν δικαιωνόμαστε, είναι τελεσίδικα.
Read the decision«Όταν δεν αποδεικνύεται ούτε η αρχική μεταβίβαση, το χαρτί καίγεται πριν καν πάει στον πλειστηριασμό.»
Με την υπ’ αριθμ. 24../2024 απόφαση του Μονομελούς Πρωτοδικείου Αθηνών, ακυρώθηκε η κατάσχεση γιατί δεν αποδείχθηκε ποτέ η νόμιμη ένταξη της απαίτησης στο χαρτοφυλάκιο της Τράπεζας Πειραιώς. Το δάνειο είχε χορηγηθεί από την πρώην Λαϊκή Τράπεζα Κύπρου μέσω ελληνικού υποκαταστήματος, αλλά η Πειραιώς ουδέποτε απέδειξε την ορθή μεταβίβαση. Πολύ δε περισσότερο, δεν αποδείχθηκε η μεταγενέστερη τιτλοποίηση. Το Δικαστήριο επισήμανε την απουσία θεμελιωδών εγγράφων (παραρτήματα σύμβασης, ειδική ταυτοποίηση απαίτησης) και κήρυξε άκυρη την κατάσχεση βάσει του άρθρου 925 ΚΠολΔ. Το λεγόμενο "χαρτοφυλάκιο κυπριακών δανείων" παρουσιάζει συστημικά ελλείμματα τεκμηρίωσης – με τον κατάλληλο χειρισμό, μπορούν να αποδομηθούν πλήρως οι ισχυρισμοί των εταιριών και να ανακοπεί η εκτέλεση.
Read the decisionFrequently Asked Questions about Cepal
Do not sign anything without legal review. An out-of-court agreement may block defences you currently have — objection, debt challenge, suspension. We review it carefully before any signature.
High volume does not mean every action is lawful, correct and unassailable. On the contrary, mass claims-management operations frequently produce errors in service of process, debt calculations, authorisation documents, claim transfers and enforcement acts. Those are what we examine first, because that is often where the case is decided.
Because the claim may have been transferred to a loan acquirer — such as Galaxy II — and Cepal may have been appointed to manage it. That does not mean everything was done correctly. We check whether the transfer, the management assignment, the notification and every subsequent act were carried out lawfully. The case is decided on the paperwork, not on the logo.
Silence is not a defence. If a payment order has been issued or a seizure has taken place, inaction allows Cepal to proceed without obstacle. The earlier you have the file reviewed, the more options remain open.
Cepal works every day. Your defence should start today.
Office at 12 Leontos Sofou St., Thessaloniki. Files are assessed on an urgent basis — every working day lost may count.